This story was produced as part of the Colorado Capitol News Alliance. It first appeared at .
The No. 2 Democrat in the Colorado Senate on Saturday shuffled the members of a key committee in order to advance his measure tweaking Colorado鈥檚 first-in-the-nation law regulating artificial intelligence, which is set to take effect in February.
The decision should end a three-day standoff among the Capitol鈥檚 Democratic majority about how to move forward on the AI policy, with tech groups and schools on one side of the coin and consumer protection groups and unions on the other.
The changes to the Senate Appropriations Committee, an extraordinary move made by Senate Majority Leader Robert Rodriguez, D-Denver, give Democrats a 5-2 advantage on the panel, whereas before they had a 4-3 majority. State Sen. Jeff Bridges, a Greenwood Village Democrat and chair of the legislature鈥檚 Joint Budget Committee, was removed from the committee.
It鈥檚 highly unusual for a committee鈥檚 membership to be changed in the middle of a session, especially in order to pass a single bill.
The committee shake-up should let Rodriguez鈥檚 bill narrowing the AI law advance to the Senate floor. The idea behind is to shift some of the regulatory burden onto AI developers instead of the companies and others 鈥� like schools, local governments and law enforcement 鈥� that deploy the tech.
The bill was stalled in the Senate Appropriations Committee because it wasn鈥檛 clear if there were enough votes to pass it on to the Senate floor. Bridges, who is running for state treasurer, was seen as one of the possible 鈥渘o鈥� votes.
The newly added Democrats on the committee 鈥� progressive Sens. Katie Wallace and Mike Weissman 鈥� said they will vote to advance the measure. The panel is set to consider the bill on Saturday afternoon or evening, and changes are expected.
Rodriguez said Saturday he was still negotiating with the governor鈥檚 office and the tech industry on how to amend his measure to make it more amenable to them. But the committee change also shows he鈥檚 not willing to give in entirely to their demands that the regulations be eased.
Rodriguez was one of the authors of the AI bill when it was passed by the legislature last year. At the time, he, the governor and the tech industry agreed to work together to make changes ahead of it going into effect.
However, an attempt earlier this year during the legislature鈥檚 regular session 鈥� as did a last-ditch effort to .
Gov. Jared Polis asked lawmakers to take up the AI law again this week when the legislature gathered starting Thursday for a special session in the state budget caused by tax policy changes in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. That鈥檚 the Republican federal tax and spending bill passed in July and signed into law by President Donald Trump.
But Senate Bill 4, which is supported by the AFL-CIO and ACLU of Colorado, isn鈥檛 the only AI bill being debated at the Capitol during the special session.
, brought by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, was introduced as the darling of the tech industry. Instead of enacting new regulations around AI, it would have policed the technology through Colorado鈥檚 existing civil rights and consumer protections laws and it would have mostly taken effect in 2027.
The legislation was brought with the backing of the and , a shopping app based in Denver.
The measure was positioned as a foil to the Rodriguez bill, which is also sponsored by state Rep. Brianna Titone, D-Arvada. But on Friday, the second day of the special session, the House sponsors of the measure gutted the bill. Instead, they made it so the measure would simply change the effective date of Colorado鈥檚 existing AI law to October 2026 from February in an effort to get the legislature to rewrite the policy when lawmakers return for their 120-day regular session in January.
鈥淒oing this in a special session is quite difficult,鈥� said Rep. William Lindstedt, a Broomfield Democrat and main sponsor of the bill. 鈥淚鈥檓 just asking that we move out the date so that we can do this responsibly during the next session.鈥�
is awaiting preliminary debate before the full House.
This is a developing story that will be updated.
